Gerald 'Joe' Moreno Deception

Moreno's Guardian Lies And Speculations

2006-11-06T19:18:00.000Z

This is the type of poorly cobbled and cribbed style of "investigation" that Gerald Moreno is well known for. In response to the recent Guardian article that presents a devastating exposé for the Sai (Youth) Organisation in the UK, Gerald inimitably found a way to twist things around to me in a full and blatant display of his continuing obsession with me.

For all of his inclinations against "conspiracy theories" that are against Sathya Sai Baba, it is funny to see how he quickly and devotedly engages in a conspiracy theory of his own! Before one reads further, it is essential to read the Guardian article (and it's follow-ups) to properly understand this issue and Moreno's skewed take on it, and then allow me to explain:

On April 24th 2006, I made the following comment on the SSB2 Yahoogroup under the heading, "You people make me sick":

"Sai Baba, male-rapist extraordinaire, has been drooling for TWO YEARS expecting the entire UK Youth contingent to travel to Puttaparthi and satisfy his perverted sexual cravings.

"It's all going down this November. Details to follow."

And because I intended to give the details shortly, I did not bother to expand on my comment. In the fallout from the Guardian article, which drew attention to an upcoming (November 2006) "pilgrimage" to Sathya Sai Baba with over 200 young boys making the journey, I made the following rebuttals to Sai devotees who were engaging in foul verbal abuse against me and accused me of being blind:

"Want to talk about blindness? I warned you fools about this months ago, but you're way too thick to pick up the hints. I even warned you months in advance about the BBC movie, and you were too thick to pick up the hints about that too. Nothing has changed even two years later. :-)"

In essence, I am merely drawing attention to the fact that I knew months ago that this trip would be taking place, and that this accounted for my sardonic comments about Sai Baba's perverted sexual cravings back in April. However, Gerald Moreno, in his utterly cockeyed and topsy-turvy way has "authoritatively" claimed that this refers to a secretive collaboration between former devotees and the Guardian journalist going back six months!

"Six months later, come November (just as Sanjay said), Paul Lewis' Anti-Sai article was published about (you guessed it) the UK Youth Group Trip and allegations of 'pedophilia'."

And if that wasn't enough, there was more still:

"Needless to say, it is exactly this type of hidden bias that is responsible for misleading so many people about Sai Baba. This very same type of hidden bias is to be found in both the Secret Swami Documentary and Michelle Goldberg's Salon.com article entitled Untouchable?. This time around, however, we have direct admissions from Sanjay Dadlani that this newspaper article was the unequivocal result of behind-the-scenes scheming, subterfuge and collaboration between The Guardian, Paul Lewis and Anti-Sai Activists themselves."

What Moronic Moreno fails to understand is that, as with any newsworthy issue, any reporter worth his salt would do his very best to take account of both sides of the story. Indeed the Guardian reporter, Paul Lewis, made all efforts to interview all parties connected to the story including Peter Westgarth, Chief Executive of the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme; Brig. Sir Miles Hunt-Davis, personal secretary to HRH Prince Philip, the Duke of Edinburgh; Tom Sackville, former Home Office minister; Hon. Michael Gove MP, and even Shitu Chudasama, the National Youth Co-Ordinator for the UK Sai Organisation. Pretty impressive even if I do say so myself.

Nowhere has Paul Lewis intimated that he was in contact with former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba, so Moreno has no proof for that claim. However, as stated already, a good journalist owuld seek to obtain all angles of the story and so Paul Lewis was certainly in contact with former devotees. Moreno would certainly turn up his nose at this, given his predilections for one-sided and almost fascist reporting that is wholly favourable to Sai Baba. However it is utterly silly of Moreno to jump to the wild conclusion that this was a scheming close collaboration, that too taking place for six months!

This is Gerald Moreno at his best; making wild assumptions, inferences, speculations and conclusions, cobbled together from all sorts of sources and coming up with a premature banana. More serious are his insinuations against Paul Lewis and his journalistic skills , when he happens to be a widely respected columnist and broadcaster writing for a highbrow national British newspaper such as the Guardian.

An example of this is Moreno's insinuations about Lewis' reporting of the US State Dept. India Travel Advisory, that warns travellers to India that:

"U.S. citizens should be aware that there have been unconfirmed reports of inappropriate sexual behavior by a prominent local religious leader at an ashram or religious retreat located in Andhra Pradesh. Most of the reports indicate that the subjects of these approaches have been young male devotees, including a number of U.S. citizens."

Naturally this refers to Sathya Sai Baba as US officials will confirm. See how Moreno completely twists this below:

Does Moreno know anything about journalistic writing? Does he know anything about how to write an article? The extremely piss-poor style of his own writing (complete with his boldened, italicised and underlined words to add emphasis) would earn him a D- from any English teacher. If one reads the Guardian article (and especially the print version) it is plainly apparent that the Advisory is being paraphrased. It was not necessary to quote the entire text which would have disrupted the flow of the whole piece. Unconfirmed or not, the fact is that Sathya Sai Baba and his Organisation are hugely embarrassed at the fact that they are named and shamed by the US State Dept. for homosexual and child sexual abuse, and this is why they cannot handle the fact that they will be named and shamed repeatedly for this very issue. It's no wonder that Sai Baba and his supporters will quibble over including words and correcting grammar.

More serious are Moreno's insinuations that Lewis intentionally misquoted the Advisory, further casting doubt on Lewis' journalistic credentials. This careless action makes it entirely possible that Lewis may consult with his legal counsel with the intention of bringing legal action against Moreno, which I think would be sufficient punitive action to prevent such careless slander from being carrie dout willy-nilly.

Further to this Moreno continued to waffle by nitpicking over the one inaccuracy in the article, Sai Baba's age. Whereas the article (at the time of writing) states that Sathya Sai Bba is 79 going on 80, the situation is that he is really 80 going on 81. Making a big hoo-ha over this is deplorable, especially since sensational new research has established Sathya Sai Baba's current age to be 77 going on 78. :-)

And then after all this, Gerald Moreno reveals to the whole world how he missed the whole point of the Guardian article:

Even though Moreno is still stupidly claiming six months worth of collaboration he fails to understand that's because the article in itself was not about Sai Baba's child sex abuses per se, but about the shameless arrogation and endorsement claims made by the Sai Organisation about gaining Royal approval for their activities! As the article reveals, Sai devotees made a grand hoo-haa about an "endorsement from the Queen" at a Buckingham Palace garden party after Shitu Chudasama was asked to address the crowd upon receiving his Duke of Edinburgh Award certificate. They even wrote a fanciful article about it (hosted on my test blog) on their official RadioSai website and were forced to pull it down after Award executives took objection and personally intervened.

Is it even possible for Gerald Moreno to comprehend the enormous scale of this story? HRH Prince Phillip is the husband of the Queen of England, and the prestige of his Award scheme has been besmirched thanks to it's association with a motley organisation who worships a homosexual paedophile as God incarnate on earth! There's no telling how high this story has reached in the upper echelons of the British establishment; surely there may be several blushing faces for allowing it to happen in the first place and to be sensationally exposed in the British media which also brought a huge and very public backlash for the Sai Organisation, causing red faces on their side too. Other newspapers in India and Taiwan have followed up on the Guardian's story which makes this British story a very international affair, and all Moreno can do is quibble over words like "unconfirmed", "scheming", "collaboration", "bias", and other accusatory epithets that fully suit his hateful agenda against the former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba.

Is it even possible for Gerald Moreno to get himself a reality check? Contrary to Moreno's unsubstantiated and hasty claims, there is no repackaging of old information as no other media source has reported on this instance of 200 British boys on their way to visit a suspected homosexual paedophile posing as a "living god", what to speak of the new reportage involving the prestige of the Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme. As far as I am aware, Paul Lewis found out about the India pilgrimage all on his own despite my writing about it in May 2006. I certainly never passed him any of that information.

As a matter of fact, and this may come as a huge shock to Moreno, Paul Lewis was not "collaborating" with former devotees for six months. In fact, there was no contact lasting even up to a month. This whole "six month" misconception has originated from the dark recesses of Moreno's dull brain after inferring, speculating, assuming and concluding his ideas after cobbling together miscellaneous bits of information from April 2006. When I made those comments, I was in fact referring to my article 'UK Youth Heading To Sai Baba Abuse', which was published only a few days later (3rd May 2006)! As you can see, I reported my findings from reading the details of the trip on the official website of the Sai Youth UK and this was what I was referring to in my public message. That's it.

Also, I have had almost no contact with Paul Lewis during the time he took to prepare his article. He emailed me on only one occasion with a view to obtain the contact details of a British citizen who was sexually molested by Sai Baba, and which I provided him with. That's it. Nothing more and nothing less. Thus it is a complete mystery where Moreno got his ludicrous "six months collaboration" idea from given that he has not even an inch of proof to support his useless ideas. Those of us who have observed his patterns of behaviour over an extended period of time know that this is typical fare from Moreno and is fit for being ignored; it has always been the case that Moreno flaps his arms and screams for five minutes and then remains quiet when someone places a cloth over his cage.

A final quote from Moreno fully exposes his way of thinking:

Just imagine: Even if Gerald Moreno was correct about a six-month collaboration with Guardian journalists, a logical fallacy is exposed in his arguments above; if I have a big mouth then how did I keep quiet about it for so long? :-) Trust him not to be aware that my comments were deliberately intended to be a verbal substitute for rubbing the salt deeply into his wounds, he would love to twist things around and claim that I indulge in careless talk.

It should be noted that upon the publication and further revelation of the Guardian article, extremely inept and pathetic responses were furnished by both Gerald Moreno and his sidekick, Lisa De Witt, who immediately set about "investigating" Paul Lewis' religious affiliation of all things! After this amusing start, they then reverted to type by doing exactly the same things that Moreno condemns in his quote above, viz., making ad-hominem attacks and rehashing old slanderous material. In that light, it is plainly clear that Moreno is very bitter about missing out on this sensational and huge Guardian exposé which is why he is coming out with all of these invectives, slanders, conspiracy theories and general quackery only after everyone else has packed up and gone home for the evening.

It's no wonder he complains that Paul Lewis "missed" his take on the BBC movie affair; it wouldn't surprise me at all if Lewis knew all about Moreno and his meanderings and had dismissed him as a quack, unworthy of even a cursory email contact. Ditto for Tom Sackville, whom Moreno claims is in receipt of his views. That in itself speaks volumes about Moreno's status as a self-appointed advocate of Sathya Sai Baba, and is perfectly consistent with the various other dismissals that he has publicly suffered in the past.

With all of the various issues surrounding Gerald Moreno, listed on this blog and elsewhere, it only remains to be seen how long a confused soul like him will survive. What with his own flip-flopping on Sai Baba's divinity, Sai Baba's sexual abuses of children, his own sexperience at the hands of Sai Baba, confessions to near-lapses into mental illness, as well as the very serious development of psychopathic tendencies, we cannot honestly expect him to continue like this without suffering a serious and major falldown.

Gerald Moreno's Media Bias Lies

2006-10-23T04:16:00.000+01:00

Gerald 'Joe' Moreno, liar and intellectually dishonest hypocrite extraordinaire, makes a big hue and cry over comments made by Andries Krugers-Dagneaux within the talk (discussion) pages of Wikipedia articles. Specifically, Moreno behaves in an adversarial manner towards Andries and insists on being a stubborn and obstinate opponent who nitpicks over every tiny little edit, so he cannot be free from bias or even good faith.

Gerald Moreno quotes the following from Andries in a desperate bid to show how the creators of the Salon.Com article and the BBC documentary were negatively biased against Sathya Sai Baba:

"In Wikipedia we give majority point of views majority space. Salon.com and the BBC favorably and extensively cited critics and ex-followers, so this is a strong indication that they agree with the ex-follower point of view." Andries 22:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Read the articles and watch their documentaries and it is clear that Michelle Goldberg of Salon.com, Danish Radio, and Tanya Datta of the BBC are sympathetic to the critics and ex-followers. Magazines and TV stations rarely have official opinions." Andries 23:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"I do not claim to be Mr. Accuracy. Yes, I made mistakes in this article and other articles in Wikipedia, especially when I rely too much on my memory. But I do continue to hold the view that the BBC, Danish Radio, and Salon.com wrote articles or showed documentaries that could in fact have been made by ex-devotees." Andries 23:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

That's it, just these three quotes. Just see how Moreno created a page with his own interpretations of Andries' comments:

Perhaps Gerald Moreno should have tried quoting Andries in context as part of his rabid crusade to defend Sathya Sai Baba. To wit, several editors including Andries were discussing the length of the 'External Links' section of the Sathya Sai Baba Wikipedia entry, which apparently contained links to critical websites and articles about the Baba. An anonymous editor by the name of 'Thaumaturgic' (who is Gerald Moreno's very close friend) got into a spat with Andries about this. Here's how that conversation progressed between them and see Andries' remarks in the proper context:

----------------------------------------------------
"Andries, you are trying to argue your case from authority. That does not make you right. The Ptolemaic concept of the universe was accepted by even the brightest of scholars and philosophers. That did not make Claudius Ptolomy right. The BBC and Salon.com do not accept your viewpoint. They simply published a documentary and an article. Can you provide me with a link to the BBC or Salon.com's official stance on Sathya Sai Baba? You are trying to mislead people about the BBC and Salon.com. Why? There should five links relevant to Sathya Sai Baba and five links each to favorable & unfavorable viewpoints. I see what you are trying to do Andries. It won't work." Thaumaturgic 22:50, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"In Wikipedia we give majority point of views majority space. Salon.com and the BBC favorably and extensively cited critics and ex-followers, so this is a strong indication that they agree with the ex-follower point of view." Andries 22:53, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Once again, where is the official statement, from any of these sites, that states explicity what you are saying? Substantiate your claim. Drawing inferences is not factual." Thaumaturgic 23:00, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Read the articles and watch their documentaries and it is clear that Michelle Goldberg of Salon.com, Danish Radio, and Tanya Datta of the BBC are sympathetic to the critics and ex-followers. Magazines and TV stations rarely have official opinions." Andries 23:05, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"Andries, earlier, you said, 'The ex-devotee viewpoint is both accepted by the media and by academics, e.g. by the BBC and Danish state television, salon.com etc. etc'. You are now changing your tune. Now, you are saying that people from these places are "sympathetic" with your viewpoint. You clearly tried to mislead people by saying the BBC and Salon.com accepted your viewpoints. Those organizations do not accept your viewpoints and have never released any statements regarding their official position on Sathya Sai Baba. If you had not been corrected, you would continue to mislead others with your careless over generalizations." Thaumaturgic 23:17, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

"I do not claim to be Mr. Accuracy. Yes, I made mistakes in this article and other articles in Wikipedia, especially when I rely too much on my memory. But I do continue to hold the view that the BBC, Danish Radio, and Salon.com wrote articles or showed documentaries that could in fact have been made by ex-devotees." Andries 23:23, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

----------------------------------------------------

So all Andries was trying to do is argue his case for the inclusion of the Salon.Com and BBC documentary links. All he was trying to say is that the critical opinions of former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba are a bona-fide viewpoint, and that such opinions are reported by the media. That's it! And then we have Gerald Moreno citing these comments by Andries thoroughly out of context and using them to "prove" a media bias against Sathya Sai Baba. Talk about intellectual dishonesty!

Another humorous aspect of Gerald 'Joe' Moreno's miscitations is his apparent leanings towards fascism. Specifically, he appears to have a serious problem with the idea that critical opinions of former Sai devotees should be allowed to be made in public! This is the possible reason why he chose to include yet another out-of-context statement from Andries as "evidence" of media bias:

Gee whiz! Forgive us for thinking that freedom of speech is a right of human beings in civilised countries, what to speak of the fact that former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba have every right to voice their concerns and criticisms against a figure who stands charged with extremely serious allegations of homosexual paedophilia, involvement in murders, financial scandals and many other disturbing crimes, and that media agencies have every right to take these alternative viewpoints into consideration.

And guess what? Moreno took this out of context too.

In conclusion, all of this provides the full context of the comments made by Andries Krugers-Dagneaux. They show clearly that - unlike the biased and partisan views of Gerald 'Joe' Moreno who has openly professed his faith in Sai Baba - media agencies who have reported on the unsavoury activities of Sathya Sai Baba do not hold proven biases against the guru, and that any suspicion of the same should pass through the proper channels instead of making reckless allegations on the Internet.

Moreno Confesses Belief In Sai Baba

2006-10-11T05:46:00.000+01:00

Sensational Update!

In a sensational update to 'To Be-lieve Or Not To Be-lieve', Gerald 'Joe' Moreno has finally confessed his belief in Sathya Sai Baba by way of citing his own personal and spiritual experiences with him:

After over a year of personal wrangling , hand-wringing and extremely intense anguish born of agonising over his faith in Sai Baba, he has now publicly declared his evangel faith (on the QuickTopic Forum) that can thoroughly explain his pathological need to insert his nose into every single forum and website where Sathya Sai Baba is being discussed, and viciously force his overbearing viewpoints onto other people.

Curiously, he insists that he is not a devotee of Sai Baba. Given the typical cultural milieu of Sathya Sai Baba and the way his devotees tend to twist everything out of reasonable common sense and understanding, who knows what definition of 'devotion' Gerald is applying here? Sai Baba himself simultaneously claims that he has not even one devotee, and yet at other times he boasts that he has more than a hundred million. So we are not too bothered by Gerald's insistence of his non-devotee status as he has just publicly declared that his fiath and belief in Sai Baba are abiding.

We may take a look at another curiosity, however. Given that Gerald has modified his statements about his devotion when it suited him to do so, a certain section of his FAQ betrays yet another confounding lie:

While this may have been true of Moreno's initial efforts, history has since shown that he has not maintained a balanced or "neutral" view into the debate on Sathya Sai Baba. Rather, he has displayed the exact opposite; fundamentalist cackling, partisan bias, stubbornness in face of conflicting evidence, thoroughly vile and vicious slanderous and defamatory behaviour against former devotees, alliance with Sai devotees of questionable character, inability to accept irrefutable facts, and much more, all in favour of Sathya Sai Baba.

It's just too bad and altogether a very tragic affair. All of his unstable behaviour can be perfectly reconciled in view of his own public admission to be absolutely and thoroughly biased in favour of Sai Baba. Gerald 'Joe' Moreno can no longer claim to present a "balanced" or a "neutral" view into the Sai Baba debate; he has been exposed all over the place as a slavish zombie mind-controlled from Puttaparthi HQ with none other than the Baba himself with his finger on the 'destruct' button.

Tsk..

Gerald Moreno's Sexy Sai Oilings

2006-10-07T04:44:00.000+01:00

One of the most disturbing things about Gerald Moreno is his claim to have been physically oiled by Sathya Sai Baba. Despite all of his long-winded, desperate and panicky-sounding clarifications about how his oiling experience - as well as the experiences of others - are not to be regarded as sexual, the simple fact remains that such experiences are sexual by nature.

Read Gerald's half-baked explanations for yourself:

An explanation is often offered by devotees that Sathya Sai Baba is supposed to be performing some sort of "healing" or energy arousal, by which the recipient often does not know what is happening since Sai Baba often does this without consent. Assuming that the explanation of healing is true, Sai devotees often use the example of how such treatment is to be seen as akin to that of a doctor; if a doctor manipulates your genitals in a medical exam, is that to be considered sexual?

Perhaps not, but what medical qualifications does Sai Baba possess? And how does he get away with all of this without consent? And contrary to what Gerald Moreno claims, a majority of these oilings do take place on the genitals or involve the genitals in some way. Gerald speaks more:

Again we hear a lot of panicky-sounding clarifications about his own genitals being exposed (or not). As before, we are not concerned with what Gerald Moreno thinks he felt in regards to victimisation or violation; the issue still stands regarding what Sai Baba is supposed to be doing? That too, without consent! If this was not so and the whole affair was as "innocent" as Gerald tries to paint it, then why even bring up the mention of genitals? Why aregenitals such an issue? Indeed, others like B. Premanand have analysed Gerald's experience and have concluded that he is indulging in a cover-up of some sort!

Ultimately Gerald offers the following fruit of his long contemplations on the subject:

Yep, that's it. Nothing! After all that tripe about being oiled, between the pubes and the navel, taking care to steer well clear of the word 'genitals', offering plenty of justifications and paranormal experiences that were due to some monkey-spanking with oil, he has nothing to offer by way of explaining what exactly Sai Baba is doing rubbing oil on the intimate parts of younger men, least of all himself!

For those of us who have enough life experiences to understand the intent and purposes of these actions, the issue of homo-erotic genital fondling is clear and needs no explanation. For intellectually impoverished and infinitely regressive people like Gerald Moreno, they are doomed to tie themselves in knots thinking up all sorts of wacky explanations that utterly fail in explaining this patent and obvious homosexual behaviour. Speaking of which, since when does forced anal penetration and genital fondling count as energy arousal?

Gerald Moreno's Sex Abuse Flip-Flop

2006-10-07T04:00:00.001+01:00

In a case with great similarities to his beliefs (or unbeliefs) in Sa thya Sai Baba, Gerald Moreno also flip-flops on the issue of whether Sai Baba is a homosexual child molester or not! As stated on his old FAQ:

However, in May 2006 due to a development in a sensational legal case, Gerald changed his views to the following:

Now I do understand the right of individuals to update and modify their views on subjects according to new information, but this episode that deals with such traumatic and serious issues such as systematic child sexual abuse leads me to think that Gerald Moreno prefers externals over human qualities such as sympathy, empathy, etc.

And considering the real story behind the case at hand, the fact remains that the case itself does not in any way deny the sex abuse claims of the plaintiff, and therefore we submit that Gerald has simply tried to find a convenient excuse to rid himself of the embarrassment he felt whenever his beliefs about child sex abuse were pointed out to contradict his own defensive actions as regards Sathya Sai Baba. While also claiming not to be a Sai devotee, Gerald has exhibited the exact behaviour of a Sai devotee which is to flip-flop on his position whenever facts are brought to light that further enunciate the fraud that is Sai Baba.

What a pity that Gerald Moreno cares not for the screams of little children as they are senselessly raped and sodomized by an evil pervert who Gerald does not believe in and whom Gerald continues to defend regardless!

To Be-lieve Or Not To Be-lieve?

2006-10-07T03:47:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno, thanks to his daily seva (service) of defending Sathya Sai Baba with a Malcolm X-like strategy ("through any means necessary"), is often mistaken for a devotee of the guru. After all, given the vast and incredible amount of time and energy that Moreno pours into his self-appointed mission by way of blogs, websites and forums, the ordinary guy on the street could be forgiven for making that mistake. Moreno himself is quick to dismiss it with a wave of his hand, even though no ring drops out of it. I think it is important to take a cursory look at the history behind this claim.

When Moreno first bounded onto the scene unpreparedly, he declared thus on his FAQ:

"I am not a Sathya Sai Baba devotee. Nevertheless, I have had many positive, powerful and spiritual experiences with SSB, as I have had with any other spiritual personalities. I do not belong to, go to, or affiliate myself with SSB Centers or the SSO."

Aside from the fact that having an FAQ was a tad on the presumptuous side since no one knew or cared to know who he was, Moreno soon realised that the above was insufficient to justify his full-time participation in defending Sathya Sai Baba. Very quietly and without a word of notice, he changed it to the following:

"I am not a Sathya Sai Baba devotee. I was a devotee from the age of 18 to the age of 25. I had/have basic philosophical differences of opinion, with several aspects to SSB's teachings (in particular, God Concepts & Karma), and I left the Sai Movement for that reason. Nevertheless, I have had many beautiful, powerful and spiritual experiences with SSB, as I have had with many other spiritual personalities. My opinion about Sathya Sai Baba (based on my personal experiences with him) is positive. I do not belong to, go to, or affiliate myself with SSB Centers or the SSO. I am an open-minded (but not gullible) agnostic."

Wow, what a change! From going to a non-devotee to an ex-devotee is a significant change in status. I strongly suspect that the reason for this change was precisely because he was feeling the heat from all those who were openly wondering why he has committed a significant amount of time and energy writing in defence of a troubled avatar who he does not believe in. It appears to have been a cynical move to gain legitimacy for his viewpoint by claiming that he has a reason for investment. Even then he fails, as his current activity does not represent his current beliefs about Sai Baba. He maintains a total of

two yahoogroups and one quicktopic forum
seven blogs (possibly more)
three pro-Sai sites, two of which include devotional content, pictures, biographies, etc.

That's a total of thirteen separate presences on the Internet (so far) dedicated to defending and propagating an individual who he claims not to believe in, and which frankly makes him look very silly. Although one should note that, of late, Gerald Moreno has decided to nomenclate himself as a 'Sathya Sai Baba Advocate'. At least that is the name that he uses to sign his blogs, and has even requested to be referred to as such:

Now see if that makes any sense to you: Moreno declares that he is not a "devotee, disciple or a follower", yet wastes no time in propagating and advocating him anyway, which includes hilarious "defences" of faked pictures, humiliating exposures of insufficient philosophical knowledge, and so on.

A day in the life of an insincere propagandist... :-)

Moreno Threatens Positive Sai Media

2006-09-30T07:14:00.000+01:00

When an independent Wikipedian like Sacca comes along, who wants to include a completely neutral source report for Sai Baba's alleged homosexual paedophilia and other disturbing crimes, such as the BBC transcript of 'Secret Swami' that is hosted on their independent site, and which is fully acceptable by Wikipedia standards, trust Gerald Moreno to come along and disagree:

And he has no arguments as such to support his view. Instead of referring to previous discussions and previous "agreements", he should be intellectually honest enough to admit that the BBC transcript is an important source report to give a succint summary of the allegations as required by Sacca.

Unfortunately Moreno threatens to bore us all with positive media articles about Sathya Sai Baba, which he claims is "fair measure" for the inclusion of "negative" statements. Hellooooooo, the BBC transcript is an independent report that is fair for inclusion, especially in the section that discusses the controversies against Sathya Sai Baba and needs a summary/statement of the allegation. It is not a "media article", it is a transcript of a television documentary about Sathya Sai Baba. But because Moreno does not agree with this, he threatens to vandalise the Wikipedia page with nuggets from "positive" articles, when the article overall contains plenty of positive things enough about Sai Baba!

This only goes to show how incredibly biased Gerald Moreno is in favour of Sathya Sai Baba.

Moreno Questions Reducing Positive Sites

2006-09-30T07:03:00.000+01:00

The latest news on Wikipedia is Gerald Moreno questioning why the positive links to official Sai Organisation sites should be reduced. 'Pjacobi', an independent Wikipedian, himself suggests the reduction in order to make the article look less biased in favour of Sai Baba. Sacca agrees with this, and Gerald questions why it must be so!

From someone who pretends that he wants to make the Wikipedia article on Sathya Sai Baba "balanced" and free of "Anti-Sai bias" (according to him), he's sure championing the inclusion of positive links.

Poor Moreno: One Year On

2006-09-25T04:18:00.000+01:00

Observant participants will note that it is more or less one year since I first started interacting with Moreno on discussion forums. Whereas the record shows that I treated him with due civility and respect, he has gradually become more and more ruder until he is now openly hostile.

The other interesting thing is that for an entire year, I never bothered to address Moreno's perverse lies, distortions and exaggerations about me except in "private" comments made on said forums. Now it is time for the truth to be revealed and is time for Moreno to be exposed as the scandalous twisted psychopathic EVIL dogsbody that he is.

Poor Moreno, can't take the heat so he is resorting to rehashing old points that he has made before on his website. Nothing new to say, so just rehash rehash rehash. :-) It won't work, Moreno has been getting away with extremely reprehensible behaviour for an entire year and now it is time for him to pay for his misdeeds. Tough luck, now everyone will know what a sleazy liar Gerald Moreno really is.

Nothing else to talk with a confirmed psychopath. He just won't learn nor will he drill it into his THICK skull. Psychopaths don't do that.

Lonely Moreno Lives Home Alone

2006-09-25T03:30:00.000+01:00

As if the exposure of Gerald Moreno's psychopathic tendencies and tendency to mock at disabled people was not enough, the "f*****g wackjob" had nothing to respond by way of regretful apologies or similar except for this:

"An admission from Sanjay that he is 'disabled'. Funny enough, Sanjay still LIVES WITH HIS PARENTS at age 28!

"Grow up you WHINY crybaby."

There you have it, folks, not even a pinch of regret for his desultory remarks, in perfect keeping with the psychopathic qualities of

Lack of remorse or shame.
Antisocial behavior without apparent compunction.
Poor judgement and failure to learn from experience.
Pathological egocentricity and incapacity to love.
General poverty in major affective reactions.
Specific loss of insight.
Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations.

Regarding my residential situation: Not that Moreno ever bothered to ask me for a clarification, nor did he explain why it is any of his business to interfere or enquire into my personal affairs (nosey parker that he is) but I moved back into my family home in order to assist my aging parents with their daily routine and other duties. Besides that, it is well-known that extended families are part of Indian culture and children do not move out of the family home, unlike Gerald who was mercilessly kicked out.

Furthermore, Gerald is hardly one to point fingers at other people in order to combat the frustrating and suffocating loneliness that he feels on account of having to live alone, as he confesses on his website:

(Click to enlarge)

And this is not a one-off either, because Moreno intends to stay that way vis-a-vis his obedience to Sai Baba's order for him to stay celibate:

(Click to enlarge)

So far be it for Moreno to point his pudgy fingers at other people when he would do well to get a life and get some sunlight once in a while, instead of being cooped up all day and night in a tiny bedroom obsessing about Sai Baba and hungrily stalking his critics all around the Internet.

Gerald Moreno: A True A.S.S.

2006-09-22T04:42:00.000+01:00

It's always funny to watch Gerald Moreno twist and squirm his way out of a difficulty when he has backed up into a corner by his own traitorous words. One of his latest refers to his "objection" of an earlier post I made highlighting his fascination with anuses.

Moreno bleated:

"Needless to say, I was not the person who created the befitting acronym "A.S.S. Team" (Anti-Sathya-Sai Team). It was an acronym mentioned on my guestbook by a person named Srinivas. Part of his submission reads:

"Hi Joe. I have been going through the contents on your website and your ongoing arguments with Premanand. It's a great job you are doing. While you have highligted the contradictions that the ASS teams have put out, I am going to list out a few, that perhaps escaped your attention. I am aware of these as I was a student at Swami's college."

"So the only 'boo-boo here' was on Sanjay's behalf. He obviously did not care to research the origin of the term 'ASS Team' and jumped to his erroneous conclusions (as he often does) and blamed me. Don't expect Sanjay to retract his comments. He never corrects his lies but rather justifies them with endless half-baked excuses and rambling diatribes whose sole purpose is to confuse, confound and bore readers to near-catatonia."

Can you believe this? Moreno is actually protesting that a term he used in full knowledge of it's meaning was created by someone else. As if that matters?! The point is that he used it and here is proof:

(Click to enlarge)

Moreno's arguments are as ridiculous as stating that the moon is made of cheese. It is the equivalent of saying: !"The fact that I called you an 'idiot' exonerates me because somebody else created that word, and you never bothered to research this." This line is so childish that I almost expect a schoolboy to pop out from behind a tree chanting, "nahhh nahhhhh nah-nahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh nahhhh."

And to top it all off, he actually expects me to "research" this fact! For the record, I already knew that the guestbook entry was made but I saw no need to account for it because Moreno proceeded to use this term in his own commentary on Exbaba.Com articles. I have no need to retract my original post because it is evidence of Moreno's increasing and perverted fascinations with male genitalia and anuses, even going so far as to label former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba as the A.S.S. team. Tough luck. :-)

Moreno's TRUE Feelings For Lisa Dee

2006-09-22T04:24:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno and his evil twin, Lisa De Witt, engage in their sinister mission to defend a self-proclaimed incarnation of God (Sathya Sai Baba of South India) from very serious widespread allegations of homosexual paedophilia, rape, murders, financial scandals, kidney robberies, and so on. They work together in tandem, stalking and harassing former devotees of Sai Baba and cooking up evil and malicious stories in a bid to discredit them.

However, things were not always so harmonious between them. A current essay on Moreno's website bespeaks his true feelings for Lisa De Witt:

(Click to enlarge)

Hilarious. Considering that this was written at a time when Moreno hardly knew Lisa and was desperately trying to maintain an impartial face, it has amused many to see how they now openly embrace each other and continue their double-trouble crusade of cloak-and-dagger skullduggery.

Needless to say, Moreno is wrong when he claims that vicious responses to attacks from Lisa were in response to attacks on her first. Is this some sort of school playground or something, were little kids argue over who hit who first? It might surprise you; Lisa De Witt has behaved exactly like a childish schoolkid with the tone of her intemperate vicious and vile attacks upon former devotees. Scandalous allegations with no proof whatsoever. What won't surprise you is that whereas Moreno may not have known all of this before, he surely knows of them now and is a direct witness to many of her abuses and insults. Still he continues to embrace her and is perfectly happy to work with a vicious rottweiler who openly wishes death on Sai Baba's critics, terming them as cancerous growths, whores, retarded, barwhores, venereal diseases, wishing brain tumours upon them, even wanting to CASTRATE them, and much more utterly shocking statements of pure hatred.

And while Lisa behaves like a child, we may as well state for the record that she was the one who first started attacking other discussion participants and former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba, almost from the very day she stepped into the public arena. :-)

Psychopath Moreno Laughs At Disabled

2006-09-22T02:56:00.000+01:00

Evidently feeling the pressure after the release of the recent blogs (which, in my view, does not even constitute a warm-up), Gerald Moreno has finally taken to climbing the walls and tearing his hair out when he really wants to tell me to "shut up".

Unfortunately for him, his method of doing so has immortalised his status as possibly the most despicable and animalistic low-class human beings that we have ever had the sorry misfortune of witnessing. As if having his sordid lies, distortions, sexual perversions (and much more) exposed in public wa snot enough, Gerald has now taken the step of descending so far into the gutter that he is way beyond the point of no return. And this is how he did it.

On September 20, 2006, Moreno posted an entry on his stalkblog entitled "Maybe This Will Help", and which displayed the following picture:

For those who don't know, I suffered a severe hearing impairment at the age of five and use two hearing aids to help me hear. I have been diagnosed as 'profoundly deaf' and I am registered as disabled. I have written about this in more detail elsewhere as regards my experience with Sathya Sai Baba.

As is typical of the hatefulness, venomousness and vociferousness of those who dedicate themselves to "defending" Sathya Sai Baba from widespread allegations of homosexual paedophila and other serious issues, it appears that no boundary is 'off-limits' and no level is too low for them to descend in their spiteful and malicious self-appointed mission. Gerald 'Joe' Moreno had poked fun at my disability before in side-comments, but here is obvious and visible visual evidence of his all-consuming hatred and malice; a picture feauturing sign-language symbols with an obvious message.

And to add insult to injury, he accompanied his picture with the following comment:

What do you want to bet Sanjay is going to throw one of his flaming, girly hissy-fits and dutifully play the victim?

lol

The comments concretised the intention behind the picture, and has revealed an alarming side to Moreno that was suspected but never enunciated to date. The label "psychopath" has been thrown about in all sorts of manners due to the media influences but it is a matter of interest to compare a clinical definition of psychopathy with the exhibition of Moreno's behaviour. The Wikipedia entry for 'psychoapthy' lists the major qualities and characteristics that are of a sound clinical basis:

Superficial charm and average intelligence.
Absence of delusions and other signs of irrational thinking.
Absence of nervousness or neurotic manifestations.
Unreliability.
Untruthfulness and insincerity.
Lack of remorse or shame.
Antisocial behavior without apparent compunction.
Poor judgement and failure to learn from experience.
Pathological egocentricity and incapacity to love.
General poverty in major affective reactions.
Specific loss of insight.
Unresponsiveness in general interpersonal relations.
Fantastic and uninviting behavior with drink, and sometimes without.
Suicide threats rarely carried out.
Sex life impersonal, trivial, and poorly integrated.
Failure to follow any life plan.

Needless to say, all of these characteristics fit Moreno to a tee! If you think this is being unfair or sensational, then it might be worth mentioning that I am a psychology student and am familiar with issues of mental health. It is also needless to mention that as far as posting an abusive picture goes, it is unbelievable that Moreno has the audacity to insinuate that I should not raise my voice in protest over his derisive actions. That's right; just like a clinically-defined psychopath he indulges in antisocial behaviour without any compunction and feels no remorse or shame for his reprehensible actions, even sneering at my right to reply. And to compund his grievous offence, he even adds a "hissy fit" smiley emoticon to ram home his point while laughing ("lol").

Typically he was not alone in this. His dearmost comrade-in-arms, Lisa De Witt, openly rejoiced at his behaviour by way of congratulating him, making the following statement:

"LOL...ROTFL!!! That is WAY too funny but he's probably dyslexic too! And of course we know Sanjay will now dutifully play the victim."

Good to see than an equally despicable person (if not more) like Lisa finds it highly amusing to mock the disabilities and sufferings of other people, but even beats Moreno by Rolling On The Floor Laughing. And yes, you did read correctly; Lisa unashamedly alleges that I might also be dyslexic in addition to my hearing impairment while also sneering at my right to reply, implying that I should keep silent and not raise an objection to their morally reprehensible behaviour! And for the record I am not dyslexic.

It is quite typical for the Terrible Twins to work in tandem stalking and harassing former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba all over the Internet, smearing them in the most horrific ways with the scantiest of proof. Now that they have fallen impossibly low in the credibility stakes and have lost the respect of almost everybody who would give them the time of day, very little remains to be said further, except for this: These are the people who dedicate their lives to the "holy mission" of defending Sathya Sai Baba from allegations of homosexual paedophilia, rape, murders, financial scandals and other very serious affairs. Sai Bba takes pride in presenting himself as an ambassador for ideal human qualities such as truth, peace, love, nonviolence and so on. How sad it is that he is left with these two rottweilers to fight his corner.

And the final irony is this: I do not know a word of sign-language. My hearing level is not as bad as other deaf people, and so I have no need to be offended by what I personally view as a worthless criticism. I just felt that it would be useful to publicly highlight the very open and scandalous behaviour of a pair of alsatians, who take it on themselves to point out every flaw that comes within their myopic purview when they are themselves held to scrutiny over their very immoral and questionable behaviour. To say the least.

Tsk..

Moreno Rejoices, Makes Death Wish!

2006-09-21T04:42:00.000+01:00

Now it looks as if Gerald Moreno has also joined the ranks of the fanatics who wish death on anyone with the remotest connection to former devotees and criticism of Sai Baba in general.

Please see: Lisa De Witt: Lisa Bombs A Temple to familiarise yourself with the issues.

After doing that, take a look at Gerald Moreno's posting where he "exposed" the alleged death wish and ended up making a death wish of his own!

Just see:

(Click to enlarge)

Tough luck to Moreno. He considers it to be very "fortunate" that the instigator of the bombings was gunned down by the police, thus openly rejoicing over Yazdani's death.

Macabre magoots, driving themselves bonkers over defending Sathya Sai Baba and creating a show of incredible public ridicule for themselves. This is what it means to be a devotee of Sai Baba: You Lose Your Mind.

Moreno is too far gone to benefit from help. I should know, I'm a Psychology student. :-)

Moreno Branded "Fucking Wackjob"

2006-09-21T03:58:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno got burned alive at TheStranger forums. :-)

A certain Datta Swami posted a long-winded essay on Sathya Sai Baba that essentially enunciated his belief that Sai Baba was innocent of the extremely serious charges of homosexual paedophila and the like. His posting was not very well received by the other members of that forum, to say the least.

Cue our neighbourhood Gerald Moreno to the rescue! With cheesy musical effects, naturally. Using the name 'Joe108', he stuck his nose into the fray and claimed that the allegations made on that forum were incorrect and provided what he thinks are the real facts. Unfortunately he drew even greater scorn that Datta Swami:

(Click to enlarge)

Yes, you read it right. Abulafia was so infuriated that he termed Moreno as a "f*****g wackjob" and sarcastically made a reference to the fact that only a "few" testimonies of sexual abuse by Sai Baba could be discounted on the grounds that "hundreds" of them do not exist.

A second member, Fawkes, informed Moreno that he did not care for what Moreno had to say. Specifically, he found Moreno's post as "boring" and explicitly regretted even reading it:

(Click to enlarge)

We know the feeling... :-)

This is by far the worst teatmen that Moreno has ever received for all of his rootin'-tootin' about so-called lies and misconceptions about Sai Baba. He has been publicly humiliated in several places but this is definitely one of the classic ones to remember. Being branded as a "f*****g wackjob" is extremely unflattering (to say the least) and this is proof of what I have been saying all along:

No one likes Moreno.
No cares for Moreno.
No one cares what he has to say.

It's about time Gerald learned this lesson and learned it well.

Moreno: All-American Dirty Cowboy

2006-09-21T02:56:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno has evidently been stalking me and reading everything that I write even on other blogs that have nothing whatsoever to do with Sathya Sai Baba. Under the subject line of "Sanjay Can't Shut Up", Moreno made the following statement:

Now why don't you act like a 'gentleman' (your word on your gaurasundara blog) and stop your cussing, lying and perversity. There's a start. Get going...shoo. :-)

The barefaced cheek of the fella!

For the record, he is referring to a post on my spiritual blog which he is clearly reading and checking on a daily basis just as he does with all of my other blogs and forums where I hang out.
Again, the barefaced cheek of the fella! Moreno is drowning in an ocean of his own arrogance and actually has the temerity to tell me to act like a 'gentleman'. The record shows that from the beginning of our interactions on public discussion groups, my dialogue with him was reasonably civil and made with due respect. Unfortunately for Moreno, the record also shows that he gradually grew ruder and ruder until he became openly hostile just as he is now.

Tough luck. He had his chance and he missed it. Even after he has used up all of his chances I have still thrown him several lifelines over the months to redeem himself and act like a person who is worthy of interaction. But no, Moreno has abused and violated all of his opportunitites untile he left the Last Chance Saloon a long time ago.

Then he has the temerity to tell me to "shoo". Here is this Johnny-Come-Lately, who only entered these Sai Baba debates practically five minutes ago, telling a 'veteran' like myself to "shoo". For the record, I have been deeply involved in both sides of the Sai Baba debate (as a devotee and a non-devotee) for just around six years now. This five-minute guy comes in and waves his gun around acting as if he owns the place!

Gun? Yes, gun. Moreno truly believes that this is the Wild West given the alarming and utterly scandalous nature of his desultory claims against anti-Sai critics which makes with complete impunity. He has no respect for other people's opinions, no respect for their views, respect for their constructive criticisim, no qualms about scandalising them in the most horrific ways, and so on. A Wild West villain. Openly hostile, drunkenly swaggering around deceitfully presenting himself as an authority.

As far as his plea for me to act like a "gentleman", tough luck again. I do not act like a gentleman to people who do not deserve it, and who themselves expose themselves as scoundrels of the worst order. Appealing to my sense of spirituality will not help either:

"A middle-devotee is he who has love for the Lord, who is a friend of His devotees, who is merciful to the ignorant and neglects the envious." - Bhagavata Purana 11.2.46

Moreno is not a gentleman, and therefore he does not deserve to be treated or spoken to like one.

Gerald Moreno's Gender Confusion

2006-09-21T01:15:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno loves to tell people that I am confused about my gender, which in turn implies that I am unsure about my sexuality and all of the implications thereof. Again we shall see how he has made the most scandalous and defamatory (not to mention the stupidest) of accusations based on the scantiest and flimsiest of evidence.

He derived his "information" after stalking me throughout the Net and coming across my ICQ profile. At the time of writing the ICQ has undergone a massive revamp whereas previously profiles were displayed like this:

(Click to enlarge)

It is clear to see that I had obviously joined ICQ in a hurry (probably just to download the software as soon as possible) and clearly did not pay attention. Obviously I had forgotten to select the current gender (male), and even if you look at the profile as it currently stands, you'll see that even today much of it is incomplete.

Moreno is so deceitful that he claims that I had declared myself as a female twice, when the top-half of the profile is clearly taken from the bottom half and other information that Moreno did not bother to include in his screen-capture. And for the record, I had logged into my ICQ account in early March 2006 - way before Moreno publicly declared his "findings" - and selected the current gender.

Trust depraved and dishonest Moreno, to pick on a simple error or lapse in attention and hold it up as "proof" that I am supposedly confused about my gender! Hardly solid evidence, considering the fact that I am listed as 'male' on every other profile of mine that Moreno has discovered in his stalking obsession pastimes. Interestingly enough, Moreno duplicated the exact same behaviour of his comrade, Lisa De Witt, who similarly attacked Ole Alstrup (a long-time former devotee) for making a similar lapse in his Yahoo profile. Whereas everyone knows that Alstrup is a male, especially those of us who directly engaged in Sai Baba discussions with him, for Lisa De Witt to claim that she is some "hotshot investigator" as she used to do at the time brought nothing but utter ridicule on her head.

Moreno has now brought the same ridicule on his head. The fact that I had corrected my ICQ profile in early March and way before Moreno went public with his "gender dicovery" shows that Moreno is plainly and utterly deceitful in that he knowingly and deliberately slandered an innocent person as being confused about their gender. He is so utterly desperate to smear critics of Sai Baba in any which way he can at the cost of his own credibility and public respect (or lack thereof), what to speak of giving the benefit of the doubt.

Tsk..

Moreno and his Homo-Erotic Lies

2006-09-21T00:42:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno is very fond of claiming that I am a homosexual, based on a couple of comments that I had made on my former blog. Let's take a look at these in detail. You'll have to excuse the first one as it was written on my personal blog after all:

"One thing that I can't understand is something that comes up when I'm reading that book about Chili Peppers. It mentions that Anthony Kiedis retrns to a theme of loneliness in some of his songs. What the FUCK? Here is the lead singer of perhaps one of the most ROYAL rock bands in the world today - rocking for over 25 years - and he's complaining of being lonely? Fucks sake, the man must have tens of thousands of groupies. Yeah yeah, perhaps he doesn't need all that shallowness and needs proper companionship and all that emo bullshit, blah blah. But still, LONELY? I really love Kiedis, perhaps even in a homoerotic way, but the man has to compare his shit with the standard we all got and prioritise."

Clearly I am expressing my admiration for Anthony Kiedis, the lead singer of one of my favourite bands Red Hot Chili Peppers. At the time I was reading his autobigraphy, and in the above blog I was expressing my disatisfaction with the way he handled the worse points of his life. Moreno, wild jumper to conclusions that he is, makes a meal out of my last sentence and proclaims that this is evidence of some undisclosed homosexuality on my part!

Here is an example of another blogger talking in almost exactly the same way: "We Love This Guy! (But Not In A Gay Way)." Trust Moreno, who himself is suspected of being a raging homosexual, to project unsavoury tendencies on critics of Sai Baba with the scantiest proof.

His next big idea derives from the following comment (also from my former blog):

"I think of Haresh, how he used to lay his head down in my lap and I'd stroke his hair. I did that spontaneously, because I know what my blood likes. All the men in our family are the same. I know I like it, and I know he likes it too. So when he lays his head down in my lap, I spontaneously stroke his hair. This guy is my blood. He's lived a shitty life and so I show him some love."

Moreno can be excused for his suspicions, but he didn't even bother to clarify this with me and what it all means. As is per his usual routine, he simply read it, jumped to wild conclusions, and holds it up as evidence of "homosexuality". Should Moreno have taken the time to clarify this with me, as he ceaselessly urges other people to do, he would have been saved from a very embarrassing humiliation.

Why? Why well, because the 'Haresh' referred to in my former blog is none other than my brother! Technically he is my cousin, but he is the closest cousin I have and we regard each other as brothers. Consequently Moreno thinks that any affection shown between brothers such as an arm around the shoulders or so is evidence of homosexuality! Or get this, incest!

Even so, it is a well-known fact that men in India openly show "casual affection" towards each other which sometimes takes the form of holding hands, arm around the shoulders, embraces and so on. Anyone who has been to India will know of this. Moreno, who claims to have made several trips to India would doubtless be able to verify this (unless he is deliberately lying as usual). Consequently, isn't it hilarious of Moreno to point his pudgy fingers (his favourite and oft-repeated phrase) at other people and accuse brothers of homosexuality when they are just showing "casual" affection towards one another? Far be it for Dumbo Joe to fling accusations when he himself is suffering extremely strong suspicions of being a homosexual and is 100% engaged in the defence of a world-renowned homosexual paedophile.

Tsk..

Mistaken Moreno Can't Shut Up

2006-09-20T07:31:00.000+01:00

Moreno has been consumed in a feeding frenzy. His latest half-baked idea is that I cannot stick to my own words. I made the following statement to a poster:

"I am going to sleep now because I am sick of all the mudflinging. That's all they can do because they have learnt it from the Pervert of Puttaparthi.

"They have proved me right once again that they have NOTHING to contribute here, so I am sticking to my signature and placing them all on my ignore list again. I will ignore the vast majority of their posts and reply only to those that REQUIRE a reply, not the usual deranged rubbish from any of them."

That was on September 14 2006. On September 19 2006 at 21:34, Gerald Moreno posted his ridiculous "exposé" about the Sai Krishna photos on a blog supposedly dedicated to "exposing" me. After commenting that this post was out of place given that there was nothing in the post "exposing" me as such, it would be better off being place elsewhere. Instead of understanding the point, Gerald immediately retorted with a long-winded post about how I had "broken" my own word of not commenting on the deranged views of mudslinging devotee slike him. Last I saw, he is still raving on about it.

Take a look at my statement again. I never stated that I am withdrawing from discussions. I simply stated that I would post to items that require a reply and not the usual rubbish, which I believe that I have done so. This is typical derangement from Moreno, who can't even read properly as evidenced many times in the past. Judging from the posts on this blog, everything that Gerald Moreno says about Sai Baba or other issues is more or less deranged rubbish, especially coming from someone who admitted going insane twice. :-)

Meathead Moreno

2006-09-20T07:08:00.000+01:00

After months of cruelly tormenting individuals such as myself and Tony O'Clery for eating meat (which we both don't do) it has now been discovered that Moreno is a regular eater of eggs.

Several months ago when Tony posted a list of anti-meat scriptural quotations in the discussion forums. Moreno piped up involuntarily informing us that he was a vegetarian, not because he was trying to follow the teachings of Sai Baba but because he had something of a meat-intolerant bodily constitution. However, that never stopped him from cheerily pointing out that the eating of cheese could be considered 'meat-eating' due to the presence of rennet within it, nor did he refrain from defending Sai devotees even after it was pointed out that a large majority of them consciously violate Sai Baba's anti-meat teachings.

In short, he is a hypocrite who defends hypocrites.

And now we have discovered that he himself eats eggs:

After this was exposed on the discussion groups, Moreno rushed to do some damage control by posting a Wikipedian definition of Lacto-ovo-vegetarianism, and was fully supported in this by his comrade-in-arms Lisa De Witt, who is herself an open violator of Sai Baba's anti-meat teachings and his entire body of teching in general. Unfortunately for Moreno, this was not sufficient to absolve him of responsibility. He is not a vegetarian for spiritual reasons, but for material reasons. Even that is doubtful because even though he claims to be an agnostic, his actions and private thoughts betray him to be heavily influenced by figures such as Jesus Christ, Buddha, and the Dalai Lama. Not mentioning his links to Mata Amritanandamayi, Ramana Maharshi and Swami Premananda.

Consequently his criticism of Tony and myself was out-of-bounds and inapplicable for the purposes of meat-eating, given that we do not eat meat. The fact that we have done so in the past is irrelevant. Moreno relentlessly brought up the subject of Tony's fish-eating spouse, all the while shoving eggs down his gullet. And whether Moreno has spiritual interests or not, he would do well to note that many spiritual leaders have condemned eggs arguably even more than they have condemned meat on account of it's being a chicken's waste product.

Tsk..

Mentally Ill Moreno

2006-09-20T06:49:00.000+01:00

Gerald Moreno likes to give people the wrong impression that I am mentally ill in his constant barrage of violent slanderous and defamatory sites, blogs and group posts about me. Recently he made reference to a comment made by myself about having a "mini-breakdown" in support of his theory.

Let's analyse this to see if Moreno is on the right track:

"1998 - While with this pseudo-guru [Sai Baba], I had undertaken an orthodox study of AdvaitavAda philosophy ... Being as conscientious as I was, I could not reconcile Advaita's constant and profuse internal contradictions and I had a spiritual mini-breakdown and took some time out for six months. At the end of this dark night of the soul, I decided to give ISKCON a chance and I randomly selected a book from Srila Prabhupada's 30-book Bhagavatam set. That random book contained ALL of the answers to the problems I was facing. Comprehending these answers and studying further Prabhupada literature gave me the confidence to reject Advaita and accept GauDIya VaiSNavism as the 'topmost'. I formally rejected the pseudo-guru in July 2001."

This is part of the spiritual bio that I wrote in my profile at Gaudiya Discussions. I am basically describing my spiritual and philosophical transition from Sai Baba/Advaita to Gaudiya Vaishnavism, a theological school founded by Sri Chaitanya Mahaprabhu. If you view my comment in context, it refers to a spiritual breakdown and not a mental one. It was a breakdown of old thoughts, ideas and constructs that had formed part of a belief system that I now see as erroneous and redundant, in favour of a new system of thought that was philosophically and theologically sound. This is purely a spiritual issue that has nothing to do with the malicious misinterpretations that Moreno makes about my state of mind. This is proof of how Moreno knowingly and willingly distorts actual statements in favour of a malicious agenda that powers his whole strawman campaign.

Moreno also frequently presents a collection of quotes from my former blog that he uses as evidence of troublesome remarks from myself. What he does not tell everyone is that he is deliberately and deceptively lumped all of the quotes together in one bunch and puts them back in my mouth as if they were said by me!

Here is the collection that Moreno uses:

QUOTABLE-QUOTES:

"I hear the guitars and it feels like a blade of steel cutting through my soul and my flesh, and it's so plesurable. I wonder how those people feel, those people who take a razor blade to themselves and cut their flesh. I wonder how it feels. I think I want to try that, if only as a release to this intense pain that I feel. Fuck, I shocked myself. I used to take bottles of vodka into college and drink it in the computer room as I surfed endlessly. I'm still fucking surprised as to how no one ever smelt it on me? So now alcohol ain't gonnabe enough to deal with this shit? I need to progress to self-harm? What the fucking FUCK?!?! I'm losing touch with reality. Someone needs to save me. Who? No idea. Who? Someone, who? Mr. Motherfucker, I pray to be able to survive. I'm scared that I'm becoming unstable and psychotic. How quaintly romantic it would be to purchase a gun and put it into your mouth. Tasting the metal as you run your tongue around the barrel, close your eyes, and blow your brains out."

Let's take a look at just two of the remarks here in their original context to see if Moreno is on the right track:

"I hear the guitars and it feels like a blade of steel cutting through my soul and my flesh, and it's so plesurable. I wonder how those people feel, those people who take a razor blade to themselves and cut their flesh. I wonder how it feels. I think I want to try that, if only as a release to this intense pain that I feel."

I have told Moreno countless times that much of the stuff written on my blog were pure exaggeration of real-life events. He chose to ignore this in spite of acknowledging the openly viewable self contradictions that exist within much of the posts on my former blog. The above post was written on October 7, 2005. Here is what I said in the post dated Ocotber 14, 2005:

"Metal seems to have the special quality of slicing through your flesh and gliding straight into a pain-wracked soul. As such, I do not NEED to cut myself. I just need to listen to some good metal, as the guitars do all the cutting for me that I need. And so I can just open my heart to the steel sword that begs to cut through my flesh and intertwine itself with my nerves, and like a violin let it play the most mournful music anyone has ever heard.. While raining hellfire spills forth from my eyes..."

In both the posts I make references to guitars, and in this post I make an open reference to 'metal', meaning heavy metal music. So for all of Moreno's rootin'-tootin' about psychological disturbances, I am simply talking about music. Sure enough, anyone who subsists on an aural diet of Metallica, Black Sabbath, Anthrax, Megadeth, Motorhead and other established metal bands will doubtless agree with me about bass and electric guitars feeling as if they slice flesh and so on. Indeed, anyone who has ever read a review in a metal magazine will find almost exactly the same type of descriptive rhetoric.

One might also wonder why I talk so descriptively myself. That may be because I am a fan of 'olde-worlde' gothic literature and have even made some attempts to do some modern gothic fiction writing of my own. See my blog dedicated to such gothic writing complete with links to literary gothic websites. One may note that the current title of that blog is 'While My Heart Gently Weeps'. This is a direct modification of a well-known series of guitar music compilations entitled 'While My Guitar Gently Weeps.' Yet again I am simply making references to music, morbid though they may be. Find it on Amazon. Just now I discovered that it is also the title of a Beatles song.

This all goes to show that Moreno, in his overriding haste to smear the critics of his beloved guru, did not even bother to check and cross-check any of these facts with me. He simply read it, jumped to wild and self-contradictory conclusions and held it up as an example of things that he views as disturbing. Tough luck, I was making references to music and nothing else.

While we're on the subject, we might as well take note of Moreno's own confessions about his mental health. In the middle of describing a period of extended illness that he suffered once in India, he made the following remark:

"I almost went crazy twice. I still remember looking in the mirror and wondering who was that person in my room! I felt like screaming and had to fight to keep my sanity. I realized again, that I was dehydrated and starting drinking copious amounts of water with electrolytes. Thankfully, the feelings of insanity left."

Yep, that's an actual quote from Moreno from his actual website, specifically speaking about his own mental state.

Far be it for Moreno to point his pudgy fingers (one of his favourite and oft-repeated phrases) at other people and comment on what he thinks are their mental states, when he evidently suffers mental problems of his own. To those who may doubt the above as a one-off incident, one only needs to see the examples on this blog (sparse as they are due to lack of time and commitment) to get a continuing indication of Moreno's mental health. His overarching all-consuming obsession with me that continues even unto this day is just one thing to observe in particular.

Effeminacy On Wikipedia

2006-09-20T04:46:00.000+01:00

I couldn't help laughing to myself when reading Gerald Moreno's user page on Wikipedia. Take a look for yourself:

(Click to enlarge)

Can you believe it? This guy is so outrageously gay. Drowning in an ocean of his own conceit, he actually believes that people may want to talk to him or even email him! Be that as it may, just see the effeminate way he phrases his words, almost exactly like he does on his own personal Geocities homepage, where he speaks about nearly going insane twice and having oil applied to his "lower stomach" by a homosexual paedophile.

I also noticed the following change in Moreno's Wikipedia profile. In the 'About Me' section, he has simply uploaded a close-up picture of a flower!

This is in keeping with his habit of flower-power identities (written about elsewhere) and his open and public description of himself as a weed covered in animal excrement. According to Sai Baba, he is worse than a stray dog too.

Tsk..

Moreno Enveloped In Blinding Darkness

2006-09-20T04:18:00.001+01:00

Moreno recently wrote a hilarious post about darkness. Here is what he had to say:

"Since this blog is about Sanjay and his darkness and negativity, I thought that my subscribers and readers would enjoy some peaceful, calm and positive imagery. So I decided to feng shui this blog with some Buddha mandalas. Enjoy!"

What this nutball can't explain to everyone is why he is so obsessed with me in the first place, leave alone stalking me all around the Internet in protest at my supposed darkness and negativity, and leaving comments everywhere that are slanderous and defamatory. Nobody told him to do anything of the kind. Here is a de-facto admission from Moreno that he willingly envelopes himself in the blinding darkness of his own creation, and this his spurious attempts to calm himself down by creating unauthorised mandalas of his own (on his computer of all things!).

Take a look at Nutball's mandalas at his Flickr site. Notice how the latest 'Jesus' mandalas are all about "love", "reaching", "forgiveness", etc. Fine example Moreno is! Coupled with all the nonsensical positive affirmations that he chants to himself on a daily basis, we can really see the effect of all of this on his character. Moreno also tells everyone of his chanting of the famous Buddhist mantra: 'Om Mani Padme Hum', which in his own words: "Invokes the Blessings of Chenrezig~ Who Embodies Supreme Compassion."

Yeahhhh. Perhaps we can blame Buddha/Cherenzig for Moreno's dirty lies and sexual perversions, anonymously stalking people and hiding behind proxy IPs and all the rest of it in his defence of Sai Baba. In spite of all his meditations on light and positive virtues, he has de-facto admitted that he is enveloped in complete and total darkness. No need to explain, we have all witnessed his sorry descent for ourselves. :-)

Gerald Moreno The 'Sai Krishna' Liar

2006-09-20T02:44:00.000+01:00

In a fit of desperation after his recent humiliation on philosophical tough questions that he has failed to answer, Gerald Moreno has taken to scouring older posts on my blog in a mad bid to find something to write about. Even though his latest "article" about fake pictures of Sai Baba has nothing to do with my "exposure" he has chosen to write about it as an exposure of me anyway! Goes to show how evil-minded he is.

Gerald Moreno has also become increasingly frightened about violating the terms of my copyright licence, which is why he has not bothered to quote anything written on my blog at these locations: The "Sai Krishna" Picture Imbroglio: Parts One, Two and Three. Not to mention the surfacing lie.

At the outset, he fully admits that the pictures are faked. How very astute of him to do so, and only after I did all the running around to prove it to boot. However, he made an embarrassing boo-boo in his very first paragraph:

"Although there are numerous accounts of paranormal phenomena attributed to Sathya Sai Baba, there are also unscrupulous people who seek to introduce fraudulent, alleged phenomena into the Sai Movement, circulate it as 'authentic' and then later rejoice in exposing the fraudulence they introduced."

If Gerald insists, I'll agree! :-) The devotees of Sai Baba who posted the fake 'Sai Krishna' pictures in devotional discussion groups are indeed "unscrupulous" in their actions. Let's not forget that very important part; it was all carried out by Sai Baba's very own devotees. Whoever the original poster was even went as far as to create a fictional story about a certain "Luther Christ" from Australia snapping a photo of Sai Baba at darshan times, only to find the developed photo as a "Sai Krishna" miracle.

I should know, I was a devotee at the time this was posted and I protested the fraudulence of this picture right from the beginning. One intellectually honest devotee (who still contacts me from time to time) asked me for proof that the picture was fake and I provided it. This means that I had to look into my collection of old ISKCON magazines for the picture, scan the image and email it to him. He then made a public announcement that I was right and that the picture was indeed a fake. In the meantime, all sorts of people (devotees) were justifying the fake picture, saying that it was a "leela" of Sai Baba's for those who "needed" to see him as 'Sai Krishna'!

This is all discussed on my blog: The "Sai Krishna" Picture Imbroglio: Parts One, Two and Three. Not to mention the surfacing lie.

Interesting how Gerald Moreno pretends that the whole thing was carried out by "unscrupulous" people, in a bid to shy away from attacking Sai Baba devotees as frauds and liars. Guess where he got that idea from? His racist and raving lunatic friend Lisa De Witt, of course. She was the one who argued with me and presented completly asinine arguments in defence of the 'Sai Krishna' picture as being a real miracle. Even after acceding to all her requests to prove my case as genuine, she ended up with the stupidest accusation ever: apparently ISKCON devotees had created the false picture in a bid to discredit Sai Baba! Moreno follows his usual routine of blindly agreeing with everything Lisa says with no proof at all, and simpkly replicates her arguments with some added speculation of his own. Why break the habit of a lifetime? :-)

Moreno then proceeds to discuss to take issue with Hari Sampath and the famous "Baba in the sky" picture. Interestingly enough, he has again used my scan of Howard Murphet's 'Sai Baba Avatar' to prove his case. He contends that the story of the woman who took the photo of the outside sky from an aeroplane (while the plane was supposedly preparing to crash-land, no doubt!) does not fit because the "miracle" picture does not show the title of Murphet's book. In addition to that, Moreno contends that the pictur eon the front cover of Murphet's book is hand-painted whereas the image of Sai Baba in the sky looks like a real person.

What Moreno forgets to tell everyone is that the picture at hand is not some sort of fictional hand-painted photograph, and that in fact it was a very popular photograph that was sold all around the ashrams in the 1970s when that picture was current. I should know, I have another Sai Baba book from the 1970s where this picture shows a 'fleshy' Sai Baba. The person who created this fake miracle picture used this 'fleshy' picture for his mischief in all likelihood, after having got his hands on one. Not rely on a hand-painted Murphet book cover like Dumbo Moreno insignificantly notes. However, he can be excused for this glaring error on the ground sof his ignorance; he simply did not know that this picture was in existence and was not even around when the picture was current.

Moreno then rounds off by stating the following, mainly a repetition of what he stated earlier but with a humungous hilarity:

"There are always antagonists who want to exploit devotee's faith by introducing fraudulent stories and pictures into the Sai Movement and then later rejoice in exposing these fraudulent stories and pictures. Luckily, many devotees and proponents have healthy skepticism and do not blindly believe such stories. I, for one, knew these two "miracle" pictures were actually altered with a computer before anyone ever publicly exposed them on the internet."

Opportunistic little runt, isn't he? After I publicly exposed the 'Sai Krishna' picture as a fraud back in the year 2000 immediately as it happened (while still a devotee) and again in 2003, Moreno has the flaming cheek to take the credit when he was not a devotee at that time and could not have known that an ISKCON picture was connected to this, what to speak of the fact that he was not a member of any Sai devotional discussion groups. Plain and simple lies. He also has the cheek to declare that "many" devotees do not believe these frauds because they are healthy sceptics.

Not according to this! Notice how the poster of that blog comes with a completely different story about the origin of this picture; he claims that he took this picture and it came out as a "miracle". Nice to see that Moreno has nothing whatsoever to say about the depravity and deceit that exists among Sai devotees, who prey upon the innocent faith of their own spiritual brothers and sisters in admiration of their own Photoshop skills. He has nothing to say about the dishonesty of devotees and the intellectual dishonesty of brainwashed devotees like his pal Lisa De Witt. Birds of a feather flock together, what else need be said?

Gerald Moreno: CRIMINAL At Large 2

2006-09-17T06:47:00.000+01:00

In my previous post I made a slight mistake. My Creative Commons licence fully allows people to copy/duplicate my work providing that they follow the conditions of the licence.

----

Update: September 18th, 2006

It has come to my attention that, typically of Gerald Moreno's ranting and raving, he has complained that my appellation of him as a criminal is unfair, on account of the fact that he "fully attributes" my work and does not use it for commercial purposes or make derivative works. He claims that I copy extracts from his hateful stalkblogs in contravention.

According to the terms of the licence, attribution must be made in the manner specified by the author. Moreno has not bothered to ask me in what manner I specify my works to be attributed to me, and never has done. While Moreno (to his credit) does not use my work for commercial purposes, he is also in contravention of the 'No Derivations' principle on account of his indisciminate mutilations and distortions of my works on his stalkblog.

Thus, Gerald Moreno is in defiance of established copyright legislation and is flouting legal provisions that protect the property of writers. He is confirmed as a CRIMINAL at large. Tough luck.

Gerald Moreno: CRIMINAL At Large

2006-09-15T05:40:00.000+01:00

Not that it would matter to an ingrate like Moreno, but my blog writings are copyright-protected by the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Licence.

This basically means that all writings on my blog are licensed under the following terms:

	Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor.
	Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes.
	No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.

Gerald should realise that his frequent quoting of my blogs on his own stalkblogs are a violation of copyright given that he has not asked my permission to host my writings on his site, nor has he attributed them in the proper way as required by me. This Licence is legally enforceable and Gerald Moreno is in violation of it.

After taking other individuals to ak for violating the copyright of his site and templates, how strange it is that he should break his own rules and flout all laws as and when it suits his fancy. But then again, our favourite Moreno is more famous for his hypocrisy than he is for his sense of responsible citizenship. :-)

He is now officially a criminal. :-)

Talk About Intellectual Dishonesty!

2006-09-15T05:14:00.000+01:00

On September 12th 2006, Gerald Moreno decided to post an article on his hateful stalkblog against me for no reason at all, lamely drawing a comparison between an incidence of bombings at a Krishna temple and my religious beliefs. His intention was to show how my apparent justifications of Krishna's omnipotence in the question of natural disasters etc. are also applicable to Sathya Sai Baba, and that any explanation I make for Krishna can be used in favour of Sai Baba. It was a very silly article which brought a smile to my face.

I responded to it here, where I discussed many other issues such as Moreno's background of stalking me, his very offensive comments against Hindu religion as well as his queer tendency to selectively quote only the parts of my words which suit his agenda. Please take the time to read that article all the way through as it is essential to understand the depths of Moreno's depravity and deception.

A day later, Moreno came up with a reply to my text. Silly me, I thought that he might have taken the time to come up with a coherent and logical response to my points which, even if I do say so myself, were well-grounded in reason, logic, and Vedantic philosophy of all things! Sadly, Moreno had done nothing except hack my text into small pieces and had again selectively quoted only the parts that suited him. Basically I had made the point that, according to the Bhagavad-Gita (and Vedanta in general), disasters happen on an individual and enviromental basis due to the interaction of intricate karmic connections. Instead of superficially blaming God for anything and everything that goes wrong (as Moreno and most people do), it is established that God Himself is seated as a neutral observer in light of the karmic connections that had to be seen through. I even included a caveat that I had presented these philosophical principles in a very reductionist manner and that the truths of this issue were much more complicated. I then made the point that, since Sai Baba has specifically declared that he is God who has descended as an avatar to ward of all humanitarian crises and so forth, it is therefore his responsibility to ward off the same. Moreno's shallow and superficial blaming of God/Krishna for the world's problems do not apply if Sai Baba is directly here as an avatar to take care of any problem.

Trust Moreno to seize upon my article, hack out only the part that suits him and ignore the rest! Specifically, he had the audacity to extract my text about karmic repercussions and completely ignored the part about Sai Baba's intervening role as an "avatar"! Even further to that, he posted his "reply" under the most ridiculous title: "Sanjay Defends Sathya Sai Baba"!

When I called him up on this, here is what he had to say:

"Sanjay, you already solved that problem. Karma! lol Using your spiritual explanations, Baba did not warn them because of their karma. Remember, there are karmic repercussions everywhere. lol

"Put aside that Baba is God. Lord Krishna cannot protect anyone anymore or any less than Sathya Sai Baba. Enough said :-)"

What can we say? This is perfect proof that shows that Moreno cares little for intelligent and reasoned debate and discussion, and is purely interested only in maligning and smearing former devotees of Sathya Sai Baba in a bid to protect a homosexual paedophile and murderer who he does not even believe in! That too, he couldn't even carry it out honestly, he had to go far enough to be abjectly intellectually dishonest with it. Just imagine! He completely ignored the extremely relevasnt part about how Sai Baba's alleged avatarhood is the crux of the problem; declaring himself as God on earth to solve the problems is really the end of the subject. And Moreno, who spuriously refers to himself as an "advocate" and "proponent" of the Baba, can't even defend him honestly.

That itself is the most hilarious thing of all. Talk about intellectual dishonesty! :-)

An Example of Moreno's Homosexuality

2006-09-14T07:21:00.000+01:00

Oh yeah, this comes from the guy who DENIES that he was sexually abused by Sai Baba when the latter rubbed oil on his "lower stomach" (you absolutely sure not the genitals?). Moreno claimed not to have any clue of what was going on, and he ALLOWED Sai Baba to molest him. That in itself speaks volumes. Can you just imagine what any normal person might do if a total stranger attempted to fondle their genitals or rub oil on their lower stomach?

Moreno's anal synonym

2006-01-09T01:15:00.000Z

"Needless to say, when Pro-Sai Activists discuss the behavior and character of Anti-Sai Activists, they whine and accuse others of resorting to ad hominem attacks! More double standards and deceit from the A.S.S. (Anti-Sathya-Sai) Team."

Boo-boo here.

Moreno on S's religion

2006-01-04T01:20:00.000Z

I also know why you are Vaishnava. Because you can "sin" as much as you want and rely on the grace of Chaitanya to cleanse your filth away.

Joe Moreno on lies, smell and stinks

2006-01-03T20:27:00.000Z

It wouldn't surprise me if Anti-Sais are being attracted to your page. Liars attract liars like rubbish attracts flies. And your page stinks to high heaven with the gutter-smell of your low character.

I know butchers who are more honest than you.

Joe Moreno on Libel and Slander

2006-01-03T17:40:00.000Z

Maybe you need a pictionary, T?

http://www.answers.com/slander&r=67

Slander:
1) Law. Oral communication of false statements injurious to a person's reputation.
2) A false and malicious statement or report about someone.

If the statements are negative and unsavory but TRUE it is NOT slander. The same holds true for defamation or libel. If the statements are negative and unsavory but TRUE, it is NOT defamation or libel.

You are a liar and I have proof:

http://www.sss.com/baba/Ex-Baba.com/A-Oclery/anthony-tony-oclery.html

The only person who has resorted to Slander, Defamation and Libel is YOU. You have NO proof to support your lies against Sathya Sai Baba.

Lump that.

Moreno mock religion

2005-12-29T01:16:00.000Z

I think it's time you start looking at your Deity Dolls and imagine Chaitanya smiling at you so, as you said:

Moreno judges other people

2005-12-29T01:13:00.000Z

"You need lots of purifying, as there is lots of filth to blow away!"

An instance of Moreno's acting as if he's qualified to judge others.

Moreno's "logic"

2005-12-29T01:08:00.000Z

"Doesn't matter if you accept 'Gour Govinda Katha' as being one of your online names or not. It was used as an online name for you, therefore its attribution is going to you" :-)

Says it all, really.

Joe Moreno and his bottle-top Collection

2005-12-28T01:35:00.000Z

Moreno was very upset and angry that I had caught him out when he erroneously claimed that I had used the alias "mikebreaker 2004" in the past.

When I laughingly asked him to submit proof of his claim, he simply replied that it was something Lisa De Witt told him. So this is proof of how Moreno listeans to hearsay and publishes it online as fact without checking any sources. It also backs up what I've been saying all along; Moreno is an irresponsible writer whose laughable claims have very little coherency, not to mention any form of consistency whatsoever.

After he was shamed into deleting that particular alias from his childish collection of bottle-tops, I notice that he had replaced it with two new ones! (Actually I noticed it before but I'm only bringing it up now)

"New" ones?

It seems that Moreno is so desperate to claw back some of his ERASED credibility that he embarks upon fanciful creations of his own. He claims to have "found" a Yahoo Group that I have run, named "Gour Govinda Katha", and has spotted two "new" aliases on it!

The only problem is that they are not "new" at all. When I sign off as "Gaura" in some posts, it is clearly a shortened version of "Gaurasundara", which is the name I use. Also, "Gour Govinda Katha" is not an alias at all, but is the name of the Yahoogroup! So how does that constitute a "newentry" into Moreno's collection of bottle-tops?

This shows that Joe Moreno is nothing but a dirty boy. Not just a serious one, but a completely silly and childish one, resorting to fraudulent tactics to "bump up" his bottle-top collection a little
bit. It's so ironic when he accuses the Sai Petition of the same thing, non-verification of signatures, non-verification of online aliases, fraudulent entires, fraudulent bottle-tops - sound familiar at all?

Apart from the irony there is a touch of sadness and regret too. If Moreno had asked me NICELY, I might have given him all my bottle-tops. :-)

This is what happens when, like Moreno, you stay up all night with milk and cookies waiting for Santa to come hurtling down your chimney with a sackful of presents. If you were listening carefully, you could have heard Moreno crying his eyes out on Christmas morning. A childhood fantasy had evaporated in front of his eyes, poor guy.

----

Moreno's response.

My response.

Moreno's second response.

My second response.

Joe Moreno's Poison Kiss

2005-12-27T04:47:00.000Z

Period. End of discussion :-X

----

Who is Moreno kissing?

Joe Moreno's Xmas Wishes

2005-12-27T02:49:00.000Z

Sanjay, I hope your Christmas this year was better than one you had last year. I thought I'd repost your deleted blog entry about last year's Christmas, hoping you will reflect and see if your negatively has decreased any. Doesn't appear it has (as a matter of fact, appears to be worse). But I thought it might be englightening.

From Sanjay's Killuminati Blog:

[snip]

WHINE! WHINE! WHINE! Nope, doesn't appear anything has changed :-)

Moreno lies about Premaperm

2005-12-20T16:30:00.000Z

Premaperm sent me new images. Enjoy!

Moreno claims exemption from SB's teachings!

2005-12-20T03:45:00.000Z

I am not a devotee of Sathya Sai Baba, so I do not have to follow his dictates. Tough luck, S!

Moreno attacks Andries for bad taste blog

2005-12-12T17:00:00.000Z

"A, I can go as 'low' as S can go. Funny how you think it is perfectly justified for S to duplicate those 'merged images' of Sathya Sai Baba on his blog, but you get on your soapbox and start preaching about 'tastelessness' when I do the SAME thing.

"S even duplicated an image of a child giving SSB oral sex under his robe! Yet YOU have the audacity to point your pudgy fingers at me and say I am 'tasteless'. Crawl back under your rock from which you slithered out, A.

"And if you were SO righteous and SO fair, it shouldn't matter if SSB is a 'public figure' or not. You should be applying the SAME standard to everyone. S has made himself VERY public in his attacks against Sathya Sai Baba. He started his OWN public blog specifically to ATTACK Sathya Sai Baba publicly.Therefore, turn about is fair play.

"Of course, I wouldn't expect YOU of being any more fair. After all, you are the same person who advertised yourself on a PRO-Marijuana site and after I exposed you, you tried to cover you tracks shamelessly, finally having the PRO-Marijuana site redirect your PRO-Marijuana Profile back to Wikipedia.

"Want to talk 'tasteless'? Look at yourself and your Anti-Sai buddies. There is more than enough 'tastelessness' there for you moralize on for years."

In response, A noted:

"Joe, I think that you are moving in the wrong direction and that things can seriously go wrong. Ever heard of the deviance amplification spiral? You are now generating one."

Moreno then screamed:

"A, you and your bandit of Anti-Sai Activists have had a long and established history of 'deviance amplification spirals'. Apparently, you do notknow what constitutes a 'deviance amplification spiral'. Have you heard of 'cognitive dissonance'? You are suffering from it."

In response to Lisa's remark, Moreno further screamed:

"Lisa, A is biased and rotten to his core. He thinks it is 100% OKAY for D to duplicate an image of Sathya Sai Baba receiving ORAL SEX from a child, under his robe, stating 'I'll make this one Sari. I came!' Yet A has the audacity to point his pudgy fingers at me for duplicating images that are NOWHERE even close to that!

"This speaks volumes about A and HIS perversity. He sees nothing wrong when his Anti-Sai Buddies do these things, but if someone returns the favor, he shreiks, snivels, raises a huge wail and gnashes his teeth. Tough luck. Turn about is fair play."

Moreno justifies his vindictive SD blog

2005-12-12T16:34:00.000Z

After writing a response to the "anonymous" Premaperm which was published on my blog and on the group, Moreno responds to justify his blog behaviour:

"More hypocrisy from the Hypocrita'lani! :-)

"When it comes to SSB's 'merged pictures', publishing them on HIS blog is NOT 'childish and immature'. When it comes to SSB's 'merged pictures', publishing them on HIS blog is NOT 'malicious and slanderous'.

"Get a grip Dadlani. I am sure that 'premaperm's' intentions were like your own, 'Even in the midst of seriousness, there is always a place for a time-out to take a breather and have a snack.' The only problem is that this time around, YOU are the 'snack'. You don't like it either. You jusitfy your actions andcrucify other's actions. Your belly can't much yellower :-)"

I respond:

"The simple point of the matter is that Moreno/Premaperm spend all dayplaying around with Photoshop and flatter me with their attention.

"Whereas Sai Baba is a public figure who has INVITED ridicule, abuse and physical punishment practically since he was old enough to walk, primarily due to his declarations to be God amongst other things, crucifying me for doing the same (with good reason) is hardly the same. Another difference is that I spend time analysing and discussing the contradictions of SB's philosophy, theology and personal behaviour as is evidenced all over my blog. If I decide to 'take a break from seriousness' and publish photos that were sent to me, that is really my own lookout. If that's a 'justification', then so be it.

"The MAJOR difference is that Moreno has opened this blog for the SOLE purpose of ridiculing me, simply because I am an ex-devotee of someone who he likes a lot. This is childish and immature. Moreno has now exhausted even the tiniest amount of credibility that he had left.

"Yep, Moreno needs to get a grip and a reality check. And a snack. And while I am very flattered to be the beneficiary of his attention and stalking obsessions, he obviously needs to seek some help:

http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/

http://www.antistalking.com/aboutstalkers.htm

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/601949.stm

Moreno lazy in research and asking for evidence

2005-12-12T16:31:00.000Z

Upon being told that Moreno would do well to take his own advice, considering the number of inaccuracies and falsehoods about me and other people that STILL exist in his site, Moreno responds:

"*yawn*

"Until you tell me what they are and provide me with the factual evidence to refute them, you have no one else to blame but yourself and your laziness~because you REFUSE, for some mysterious reason, to tell me what they are :-)"

I responded:

"This is about as ridiculous as accusing someone of beating their wife and asking them to refute it, without realising that it may be a groundless accusation in the first place. In the same way, Moreno makes various groundless assumptions and conjectures - passing them off as fact - and then expects me to refute them with "factual evidence". To this idiot, no less, who sits in New Mexico and presumes to know everything about everyone. *rolls eyes*

"So let Moreno stand like a fool, with all of his inaccuracies, to belaughed at by the world especially by the time I am finished with him. :-)"

Moreno's answer? Nothing.

Moreno claims about Photoshop

2005-12-10T03:47:00.000Z

"And I do not own photoshop. I have an outdated version of paintshop pro. I am familiar with my PSP, but have never been able to get the type of quality that Premaperm did. Once Premaperm teaches me, I am going to update :-)"

Joe Moreno opens site dedicated to SD

2005-12-10T03:16:00.000Z

Today, I received an email from an anonymous person named "premaperm". This person sent me "merged images" of Sanjay Dadlani, in response to the "merged pictures" of SSB that Sanjay published on his blog.

Needless to say, I had a GOOD laugh (and am still laughing) and decided to create my own blog exposing Sanjay Dadlani. I decided to put these pictures on my blog as well. I feel that if Dadlani thinks it is entertaining and jusitifed to post merged images of SSB (some blatantly sexual in nature) on HIS blog, I see no reason why I can't do the same on MY newly created blog. Fair is fair.

My thanks to "premaperm"!

http://sanjaydadlaniexposed.blogspot.com/

"Hope these give you a good belly laugh as they did me!" ~Sanjay Dadlani on his own blog at: http://saibabaexposed.blogspot.com/

------

In response:

Yes, this certainly displays Moreno's (im)maturity for all the world to see. This is one for the record. :-)

Trust Moreno not to comment on any of my blogs (except the ones where he contradict's SB's own views), but to engage in completely childish actions involving stealing my images and merging them onto pictures of animals and the like. Hilarious indeed.

A short while ago, Moreno mentioned that he can talk about credibility. Not now. :-)

And by the way, there is no "premaperm". The pictures were created by none other than Joe Moreno himself.

Moreno's hypocrisy on jumping to conclusions

2005-12-09T01:43:00.000Z

"Next time ask before jumping to your erroneous conclusions, [D]."

Considering the number of of plain innacuracies and falsehoods present on Moreno's website that have still not been corrected (at the time of writing), it is indeed hilarious to see Moreno doling out advice when he would do well to take his own.

Joe Moreno justifies his stalking obsession

2005-11-29T02:50:00.000Z

>> You have no one to blame for your reprehensible behavior but
yourself. After all YOU opened your BIG mouth and challenged me to
research information about you, for myself. Which I did. <<

What a paltry justification for following me around all over the Internet, logging all of my posts at various different forums (since 1998), JOINING them and making deliberate posts meant for my attention, interfering in my private life wherever possible, violating privacy by publishing a private journal for public view, as well as exhibiting general obsession characteristics. Not to mention writing various spurious articles with half-baked facts and equally half-baked conclusions which are incorrect and foolish.

>> d" your challenge to me and have him rule in your favor after you
bore him to near catatonia with your wordy and BORING diatribes.
>

Is Moreno looking in the mirror? :-) There is a very good reason why none of the anti-Sais ever bother to respond to his emails. I wonder what it is? :-)

> Since you lie and "embellish" so much, I simply enquired about your
claim that you were sexually abused at Bhaktivedanta Manor. They are
not aware of that claim either, it seems.
>

I was SEXUALLY abused, was I? :-) Typical Moreno, jumping to conclusions. :-)

LOL, ha ha ha ha ha. :-) This is also going on the record. :-)

>> Your blog entries were NOT embellishments. <<

My apologies. I forgot that Moreno has omniscience capabilities. It is very possible that, by virtue of his kinship with the Lord who resides with all souls as the Inner Witness, he was a direct but invisible witness to ALL of the "events" that I described in my blog. :-)

Nice try, Moreno. :-) LOL.

It is obvious WHY Moreno desperately clutches to my blog entries as "evidence". He needs it so badly in his fancy crusade against me. :-)

>> All along you have contended that your killuminati blog was
"private". <<

Blogs at Blogspot have the option of being listed. Since I chose "No"to having it listed, it is private for all intents and purposes. However, it is still "publicly accessible" by virtue of it being on
the Internet.

In any case, this does not justify Moreno's actions of taking a "private" diary journal and publishing them elsewhere for public view. Even an ordinary kid on the street you that even READING someone's diary is wrong. :-)

>> You told the truth in them because you didn't think anyone would
find them. IF you embellished them, you LIED in them. Either way, you
are a liar Sanjay. You are not fooling any of us. Who "embellishes"
what they eat in "private" blogs? The more you try to explain away
your blog, the more comical you sound. <<

Nice try at twisting the subject, again. :-) Of course it is a matter of opinion regarding the probablity of "lying". I have all along stated that embellishments were made for a specific audience, namely, my subscribers. It is really none of Moreno's business. :-) And I personally do not care if he reads my blogs with glee. What I DO object to is the ethical violation of publicly publishing "private" diary entires where, even along with the embellishments, I do communicate some private thoughts.

For all of Moreno's guff about morality, ethics and humanity, he stands as a violator of all three based on his own actions and commentary.

And of course this goes on the record. :-)

Moreno admits his faulty research

2005-11-27T23:43:00.000Z

When I asked Moreno to backup his claim that I eat meat, as well as his claim that I have used "Mikebreaker2004" as one of my online aliases, he had the following to say:

Sanjay, it was a name Lisa gave to me. Since you have denied using it, I removed it from the list. As if it makes the contents to that page any less shocking!

Considering such a poor standard of research, I had this to say in response: "Yes, this shows how Moreno hardly does any research except REPEAT AND ENLARGE ON the arguments provided by others, which is what I have been saying all along! It's great to see Moreno and I finally agreeing on the fact that he is rubbish at research. :-) Changing the page makes no difference."

Moreno certainly prides himself on the "veracity" of his articles. Even though he frequently claims that any errors will be corrected if reported, his behaviour has usually and consistently been to stubbornly argue that his original impression was correct.

Moreno justifies meat-eating of SB devotees

2005-11-27T22:52:00.000Z

Tony, your views about meat-eating are really wishy-washy. You can't make the case for ahimsa AND the slaughter of animals at the same time. On one hand, you talk about how represehensible slaughter and the taking of innocent lives are, but then on the other hand, you PARDON and EXCUSE the bloodshed, violence and suffering for those who are "not on a spiritual path".

You even seem to make the case that the slaughter of animals is murder. It's like you are saying "Murder is wrong. However, if you are not on a spiritual path, Murder is okay." Come on.

Jesus ate meat. Buddha ate meat. Shirdi Sai Baba ate meat. Muhammad ate meat. Moses ate meat. The overwhelming majority of Christians, Muslims and even Hindu's eat some sort of meat. In Sri Lanka, the Buddhists even request meat! They are not supposed to, but they do. Very few Christian Saints abstained from meat. Very few non-Hindu saints abstained from meat.

One of the perplexing ideas about meat-eating is WHY a Creator would create the human and animal kingdom, that almost exclusively relies on violence, suffering and bloodshed, for its survival. If you look beyond the beatiful sunsets, flowers and prairies, you will see that nature is one giant meat-grinder. Things are always eating and killing other things. In the sky, in the earth, on the earth and in the water, things are always eating other things. Even if every single person became a vegetarian, there is plenty of violence in the animal kingdom. There is plenty of suffering in natural disasters and diseases. Everything suffers and dies. Such is the brutal nature of the world.

Now people can make all sorts of "spiritual" excuses for these things. To me, however, violence is violence. Suffering is suffering. Pain is pain. Killing is killing. I will not justify it like you. It should not matter if your wife does not eat beef. Is the slaughter of a chicken, fish, turkey, goat, deer or pig any more justifiable than the killiing of a cow?

It seems to me that many people who are "spiritual vegetarians" are on an ego trip where they think they are better than others. Since you are an established liar and deceiver against Sathya Sai Baba, you are NO better than the hundreds of millions of meat-eaters who live respectful lives that are dedicated to fairness and honesty. I know butchers who are more honest than you.

Not all of SSB's devotees will be able to follow his dictates. There are some Christians, Muslims, Hindus, Jews who cannot follow the dictates of their own religion. Although it is praiseworthy that SSB asks his followers to abstain from meat-eating and bad habits that will impact their health, he knows that not all people will be able to follow his precept and example. All he can do is try. The choice, however, fully rests on the follower to put it into practice.

You believe in the non-dual philosophy. Can you practice it? From your numerous posts full of judgmentalism, hate, anger and negativity, it is clear you can't practice your own beliefs. But you love to cast stones at others to detract from yourself. Now you can excuse your behavior by professing that you are "detached", etc., etc., etc., but in the real world, you are judged by both your words and actions. Not just your words (which you should know, because you judge SSB for his words versus his actions). I see no reason why others can't judge you based on your words and actions as well.

You have openly lied about Sathya Sai Baba. You have made numerous accusations against him with NO proof. You even tried to publicly associate SSB with a known pedophile. You have done these things out of spite and some sort of perverted sense of amusement. Your criticism is moot. Your opinions don't matter. No one cares about your whine because you have lost all crediblity. It is of little wonder that you are so duplicitous regarding ahimsa and the slaughter of animals.

Moreno on SB's attitudes to women

2005-11-27T07:15:00.000Z

--- In sathyasaibaba2@yahoogroups.com, vishvarupa108 wrote:
>
>
> This discussion about Sathya Sai Baba and his traditional views about women is rather thought provoking. There are many relevant factors that are not discussed like India's socio-economic condition, the studies that discuss the benefit of parents raising their children (as opposed to day-cares or babysitters) and SSB's philosophy about the importance of women in shaping the character of children.
>

Irrelevant. It has been observed on this board ( which can be found somewhere in the archives) that SB specifically expresses the sentiment that a woman's place is to look after her husband and wconcentrate on cooking. As we know, this attidue will not fly well in the modern world, regardless of "justifications" about India's socio-economic condition.

> Sanjay Dadlani fully associates himself with the Hare Krsna's and Gaudiya Vaishnavas who have an established history of women degradation, believe that men are superior to women and feel that women have their place at home (with children) or in the streets preaching.
>

I have stated several times that I am not a member of the Hare Krishna (ISKCON) movement. I am a Gaudiya Vaishnava, however, and there is no "degradation of women" in Gaudiya Vaishnavism.

> However, putting these facts aside, let us look at Sanjay's opinions about women and ask yourself WHY Sanjay is critiquing Sathya Sai Baba. One would naturally assume that since Sanjay is critiquing Sathya Sai Baba, Sanjay would have a more moral and common-sense view regarding women and their place in society. Or so one would think....
>
> Let us recapitulate Sanjay Dadlani's OWN words and views about women:
>

How boring to inanely repeat statements that I have stated on several occasions to be exaggerations for the nenefit of a reading audience.

But then of course, I understand why Moreno feels the NEED to portray me in such a way. It suits his need to malign me. :-) Unfortunately it doesn't work since this is board is meant to discuss Sathya Sai Baba and not Sanjay Dadlani. So much for the ad-hominem way of doing things. :-)

Moreno: Lacto-ovo-vegetarian

2005-11-27T06:08:00.000Z

I'm an ovo-lacto-vegetarian. But not because SSB wants me to be one. I'm a vegetarian because I have an intolerance to meat/fish/poultry protein. Always have. Personally, I see no difference (personality- wise) between meat eaters and vegetarians. Some of the nicest people I've met in my life were meat eaters. Vegetarians can be just as mean and vicious as anyone else (look at some of the advocates for PETA).

Of course, there is always the issue of slaughter. Personally, I am grateful that I do not contribute to the slaughter of animals. I think the issue of slaughter is an important one. People do not "need" to eat meat and I think that any effort to cut dow on the slaughter of animals is praiseworthy. Most gurus ask their devotees to abstain to meat. So that is nothing new with SSB.

Nevertheless, I'm not sure what point you are trying to make Tony. Your wife eats meat.

Moreno always loves to make an issue of how anti-SBs apparently point fingers and engage in "vicious defamation". Whereas Moreno relates above his non-consumption of meat, what is the point of "pointing a finger" at somebody's wife? Is this not the same kind of immature fault-finding that he typically rails against, yet indulges in it himself?

Moreno mocks religion

2005-11-12T06:32:00.000Z

Hare Krsna! Sri Krsna Chaitanya, Prabhu Nityananda, Sri Advaita, Gadadhara, Srivas adi gaura bhakta vrindaNityananda!